2a: Defining person

Regarding Premise 2a, that to be a
human organism is sufficient for
personhood1, a dictionary
definition should suffice. We’ve
looked in lots of dictionaries, and
the first entry under person is
invariably a “human being,” a
“human individual,” a “living
human being,” or some identical
variant. Nothing more.
Note what we mean by definition here. In one sense, the definition of person is “an entity possessing intrinsic value.” To be intrinsically valuable means to have inherent dignity and associated inviolable rights which are (or ought to be) recognized socially. In fact, this idea is exactly what we defended as Premise 1. In the present section, by contrast, we are interested in another sense of the definition of person. Specifically, we are interested in learning the minimum set of characteristics that one must have in order to be an entity possessing intrinsic value. Like the common understanding reflected in the dictionaries, pro-lifers hold that there are two: human and organism.
-
Discussion Tip
When pro- choicers deny Premise 2a, press them to articulate an alternative definition that makes more sense to them. When do they think personhood begins? Why? ↩